Lacerte bust - Sch E p 2

Client has an enormous stack of those worthless investment partnership K-1s - the ones where all the boxes have "SEE STMT" and then you have 10 pages of dollar amounts with inscrutable notes about where to put what.

Among those are "Other Portfolio Income," "Other Trade or Business Expenses," and "Other Ordinary Loss." As best as I can tell, all those things end up on Sch E p 2; my preference is to have them separately stated there, because when you net expense items against Box 1 (where the second two arguably could go), you get a CP-2000 for not reporting all your K-1 income.

If you have a simple K-1, and multiple items of income and loss in the "Other nonpassive items" Ctrl+E box, the Sch E p 2 looks right: all the descriptions show up with the right amounts. When you have lots of complex K-1s, Lacerte breaks down somewhere, and the income items are netted against the loss items, so you have the descriptions of the income items but no amounts, and the amounts with the loss items are smaller than they should be, and you have positions that aren't adequately disclosed.

After an hour with tech support, they were unable to fix it. The suggestions they came up with were:
- Just net them with Box 1. (doesn't work because of CP-2000)
- Call up the K-1 issuer and tell them they were producing deficient K-1s. (These are all Big 4 prepared K-1s, so while I may have a good argument as to their deficiency, it's not like my complaint would get them to amend K-1s that are done arguably right.)
- "I can submit it as a bug, but it won't be fixed."

I told the woman that that last bit was BS - that it could be fixed if there were enough push behind it, because I've seen fixes go out in a lot less than the 6 weeks we have left. But she was obviously not a pusher, and the trainer who had been trying to help her had already determined that it was either me or Deloitte doing it wrong, not Lacerte.

So if you've got that situation, watch out, because your returns may be wrong.

4 additional answers

No answers have been posted

More Actions

People come to Accountants Community for help and answers—we want to let them know that we're here to listen and share our knowledge. We do that with the style and format of our responses. Here are five guidelines:

  1. Keep it conversational. When answering questions, write like you speak. Imagine you're explaining something to a trusted friend, using simple, everyday language. Avoid jargon and technical terms when possible. When no other word will do, explain technical terms in plain English.
  2. Be clear and state the answer right up front. Ask yourself what specific information the person really needs and then provide it. Stick to the topic and avoid unnecessary details. Break information down into a numbered or bulleted list and highlight the most important details in bold.
  3. Be concise. Aim for no more than two short sentences in a paragraph, and try to keep paragraphs to two lines. A wall of text can look intimidating and many won't read it, so break it up. It's okay to link to other resources for more details, but avoid giving answers that contain little more than a link.
  4. Be a good listener. When people post very general questions, take a second to try to understand what they're really looking for. Then, provide a response that guides them to the best possible outcome.
  5. Be encouraging and positive. Look for ways to eliminate uncertainty by anticipating people's concerns. Make it apparent that we really like helping them achieve positive outcomes.

Select a file to attach: